Case Study
MLX91206 Automated Programming & Calibration
This case upgrades the original article-style content into the Cases V2 structure. The project is built around Melexis PTC04 and MLX91206, converting manual programming pain points such as low efficiency, manual data input, error risk and lack of traceability into API-controlled, configuration-based, automatically executed, verified and recorded production flow.
Project Overview
Automated programming and calibration case based on Melexis PTC04 and MLX91206, integrating parameter configuration, API control, automatic execution, read-back verification, EEPROM/Image comparison and production records into a traceable flow.
Testing Requirements
- Reduce risks caused by manual parameter input and manual programmer operation.
- Control Melexis PTC04 through API to execute MLX91206 programming and calibration flow.
- Support configuration-based parameters, automatic execution, read-back verification and production records.
- Compare manual and automatic programming data, including EEPROM / Image comparison.
System Architecture
Key Test Items
Engineering Challenges
- Manual programming has pain points such as low efficiency, manual data input, error risk and lack of traceability.
- The automated programming flow needs to connect parameter configuration, equipment control, execution result and verification result.
- The verification method needs to cover read-back verification and EEPROM / Image comparison.
Implementation
- An API control flow was developed to let Melexis PTC04 execute programming and calibration automatically.
- Configuration-based parameters reduce dependency on manual data entry.
- Read-back verification, manual/automatic data comparison, EEPROM / Image comparison and production records are added.
Engineering Outcome
- An automated programming and calibration flow was built for MLX91206.
- Programming, verification and records are organized into a traceable production flow.
- The page does not disclose unverified data such as programming speed, yield improvement percentage or error reduction percentage.
Related Solutions
Related Engineering Capabilities
Discuss a Similar Test Requirement
If your DUT, coverage, cycle time or data requirements are similar, we can start from interfaces and test strategy to evaluate the architecture.
Contact onTAP